🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents applauding your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals joined a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after viral posts indicated that switching their gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting results-driven professional jargon like "drive", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Questions Raised

The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in the platform's system prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Similar to many large networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content appear to which users - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender on your profile does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• First, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with similar "agentic" language

The outcome was instantaneous: a 415% increase in reach within one week.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the test after seven days, stating "Every day I persisted, and results got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her race to "Caucasian" described a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to understand how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and social space.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly caused female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute content based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."