🔗 Share this article

As the political power of Donald Trump diminishes and his public demeanor becomes more erratic, there has been an escalation in vitriolic attacks aimed at female journalists and racial minorities, with Somali Americans as a recent focal point. These disparaging remarks gain traction stems from the animosity behind them and his position, not their factual accuracy. In a parallel manner, the government's actions against immigrants are haphazard and founded on falsehoods. It is abundantly clear that the objective is not targeting those who have committed crimes. The assault is directed at people of color.

This includes Indigenous peoples carrying tribal IDs to naturalized US citizens, individuals performing critical jobs in building sites and hospitals to military veterans, college students, residents asleep in their beds, and toddlers: a wide array of the country's population is under siege.

"ICE operations are brutal, inhumane and achieve nothing for community security," asserts a leading political figure from New York. Scenes featuring masked agents breaking car glass and separating parents from children, terrorizing entire communities and disrupting schools and businesses, achieves the opposite effect.

The cycles of calculated hatred—focusing on people from Haiti in the 2024 campaign, Venezuelans this year, and most recently Somali Americans—lean heavily on libelous lies and insults. The reason is simple: the truthful data about these groups of people do not justify the animosity.

The Mythical Nation of White People Versus Actual History

The strategy of frightening and vilifying claims to seek at recreating a uniformly white United States which is a fiction. Although America had a larger white population in the youth of today's white supremacists, it never constituted a purely white nation. At the nation's founding, the thirteen founding colonies contained a substantial percentage of African and Native American individuals—some southern states were over one-third Black.

When the United States expanded, annexing Texas in 1844 and seizing Mexico's northern territories in 1848, it incorporated a large community of Hispanic settlers already living across what is now the Southwestern U.S. and California. Historical records show the first African Muslim in territory that became the U.S. came as part of a Spanish exploration party almost one hundred years before the Mayflower English Puritans landed in Massachusetts in 1620.

Population Truths Versus Coercive Fantasies

The systematic targeting of vast numbers of people of color and even mass deportations cannot fabricate the ethnically pure country of extremist imagination. Los Angeles, for instance, is close to 50% Hispanic, and regardless of aggressive enforcement, arrests, and deportations, it remains so. The city's very name is Spanish, an enduring reminder of who was there first.

The entirety of this animus and oppression looks like the fear of bigots attempting to believe they can stop the coming changes of a country no longer majority-white through sheer brutality.

It is coupled with an attack on abortion access that is, sometimes, openly intended to prompt Caucasian women to bear more babies. The rationale cites a fertility rate below replacement level in the US, a trend less impactful than in some other nations because of a young, industrious immigrant workforce that sustains the economy. However, rather than providing the social support that might make raising children easier, the approach is based on punishment and force.

A prominent journalist observes that the policies on childbirth espoused by figures like JD Vance—along with insults toward childless women—amount to pronatalism. This ideology "typically merges worries about declining birth rates with anti-immigration and anti-women's rights ideas."

Similarly, analyses show that "attempts to raise the fertility rate cannot make up for broader policies designed to cut government assistance initiatives like Medicaid and insurance for kids. The so-called 'pro-family' focus is not just for encouraging procreation. Rather, it is utilized as a tool to advance a conservative agenda that endangers the health of women, reproductive rights, and labor force involvement."

Contradictory Strategies and Public Rejection

The combination of anti-immigration and pro-birth policies constitute an effort to artificially redirect the country's population future. In the end, they represent foolish bullying by individuals filled with hatred who inadvertently reveal that their claims to superiority must be based on skin color and sex; without these constructs, their positions devolve into incoherent nonsense.

A lot of the reasoning offered by the Trump team does not match up with tangible facts and actual outcomes. As an instance, maritime attacks in the Caribbean Sea frequently focus on tiny boats which are not proven to be transporting drugs and incapable of making it to the United States. Similarly, Venezuela's role in the fentanyl trade is negligible, and its involvement with cocaine is much smaller than that of other South American nations.

The administration's stance extends to environmental policy, with a rejection of "the science of climate change" and "carbon neutrality targets." There is a sentimental attachment to fossil fuels, especially coal mining, leading to policies that compel localities to spend money on obsolete and toxic energy sources while undermining cheaper, cleaner renewables. At the same time, public health leadership have advanced anti-scientific dietary schemes while weakening broader health protections.

The core premise of the anti-immigrant offensive is that people of color born abroad are threatening outsiders. However, across the nation—in cities like L.A. and Charlotte, from Chicago to Portland—the government's own forces, immigration enforcement personnel, whom local communities perceive as the unwelcome, violent invaders.

No symbol is more powerful of the widespread rejection of this approach than the thousands of people mobilizing, demonstrating, facing danger and detention to defend their neighbors. City after city has risen up in defense of its residents. All the insults and threats can change that reality.